There are current donors and prospective donors. If you want to get on the donation bandwagon but don’t know where to begin, here’s a high-level, step-by-step overview of how to ask for a donation. But there are also some basic steps to keep in mind to ease the asking for donations journey. There are many ways to ask for donations, depending on which channel you’re using, who you’re asking, when you’re asking, and whether Mercury is in retrograde. Buckle up it’s gonna be a wild (and highly effective) ride. Either way, we can help you take things up a notch as we dive into the nitty-gritty details of asking for a donation. Maybe you’re a fundraising expert who’s planned swoon-worthy black-tie galas start to finish, or perhaps you have grand fundraising aspirations but have only dabbled in the fine art of Kickstarter campaigns. Donations are what makes the nonprofit world go round, raising awareness and funds for your cause and letting you make a bigger impact. Suggestions about how fork should be done, etc.When it comes to fundraising, a good place to start is at the very beginning-and that means knowing how to ask for donations. Never work”, or “prove it!”, or “why don't you fork it”, or (as opposed to, say, saying it's wrong place to discuss, or “it'll Help by discussing facts, being positive in general and stay on topic. So, whenever this argument about modernization of emacsĬomes up, and if you think there are valid points in this, you can Usual term used among tech geekers today is “contructive criticism One way you can help the cause, is by helping to dispell myths. Guy quite few years to come into shape, and he's not shy about asking Perhaps 10 or 100 times smaller.) Nevertheless, it took the Aquamacs (the changes inĪquamacs in comparison to Xemacs back then, in terms of manpower, is Years ago, is really just few trivial UI changes. ![]() Thus theĪquamacs, in comparison to Xemacs in its historical context some 20 The collaboration with GNU Emacs, mainly Richard M Stallman (RMS),įinally can't work out for multitudes of reasons that are oftenĪttributed to RMS's character and GNU project's snail speed. The company's eventual commercial goal, was to produce a commercial Inc in the Lisp machine and Artificial Intelligence days (1980s), and Xemacs, started as Lucid Emacs, was run by a commercial company Lucid Still, a couple years of full time job to After all you do believe a majority preferred > If you think there are enough users out there, you should be able to > the associated tasks of running a website with public annoucement and > The actually coding part for the latter will prob be dwarfed by all > modernization, or i actually take things into my hands and start my > So, either i try to spend tons of time to be the salesman for emacs ![]() > Just make sure you stay as compatible as possible so that no work is If any suggestion in the human world needs to be proven first, nothing Thus needs to see the light to be proven. I hope you are not suggesting that my suggestions are totally fringe > it is the most effective (and perhaps only) way of proving your point: ![]() I don't think it's the best way to make such a change, but > coder and fork it, like Xemacs and Aquamacs did. > The most effective way to make such change, is just have a capable > distro that's just my ideal of what functional, BEST efficient, > I just might down the road start my own emacs cult. On Jul 29, 4:13 am, Nikolaj Schumacher wrote:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |